1 2025:CGHC:4669 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3610 of 2018 • Arjun Meshram S/o Shiv Prasad Meshram, Aged About 49 Years R/o Renga Dabari, Tahsil Daond • ilohara, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Principle Chief Conservator Of Forest, Head Quarter, Jail Road Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Chief Conservator Of Forest Durg, Durg Circle, Near 5 Building District Durg, Chhattisgarh 4. Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Rajnandgaon, In Front of PTS, G.E. Road, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None For Respondents/State : Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 27/01/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to regularize the petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to dispose off the present writ petition as Annexure P-4 and direct the respondent authorities to decide the claim of petitioner within a certain time frame. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner. 10.4 That, cost of the petition may also be awarded.” 2. Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State woulds submit that the petitioner has sought a direction to the respondent authorities to consider his claim for regularization. He would further submit that during the pendency of this petition, the claim of the petitioner has already been rejected by the committee constituted pursuant to circular dated 05.03.2008 and the petitioner has not challenged that order. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the claim of the petitioner with regard to regularization has already been rejected by the committee, the instant petition has become infructuous. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the decision taken by the committee, if so advised. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti