ANOOP KUMAR VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME, LKO. AND ANOTHER
/9657/2024 · 2025-12-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181867 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181867 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9657 of 2024 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Sri Jayant Pratap Singh, Advocate, has filed a supplementary affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for private respondent. 3. This application has been filed mainly with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 31.03.2014 passed by the court of ACJM room no. 27, Lucknow and including entire proceedings of the case arising out of crime no. 208 of 2013 under section 342, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Saadatganj, District Lucknow, in the interest of justice. It is further prayed that the chargesheet filed against the petitioner in case no. 1751/2014 (State of U.P. Vs. Anoop Kumar Verma & others) under section 342, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Saadatganj, District Lucknow, may also be quashed, so far as the same relate to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which is said to have taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as ANNEXURE NO. 1 to the to the supplementary affidavit filed today. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jayant Pratap Singh, Omkar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Abhay Pratap Singh, Akriti Pandey, Priyanka Singh Anoop Kumar Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8.
For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 16, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9657 of 2024 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench