Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181862 (ALL)

LAXMI KANT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. LOK NIRMAN VIBHAG U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/13766/2025 · 2025-12-04

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13766 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to provide benefits of VIth Pay Commission to petitioner with effect from 01.01.2006 instead of year 2007. Arrears of difference of such salary from 01.01.2006 till 08.04.2011 along with interest has also been sought. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.4 i.e. Executive Engineer, Provincial Division, Lok Nirman Vibhag, Barabanki or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. December 4, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Karan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Laxmi Kant .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Lok Nirman Vibhag U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench