MOHD. HARUN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/12775/2025 · 2025-11-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181854 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181854 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12775 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard Sri Prateek Kumar Rai, Advocate holding brief of Sri Alok Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :-
"Issue writ order in nature of mandamus commanding to the concerned opposite parties that they consider the case of petitioner and grant the pension to petitioner and thereafter to also pay the arrears thereof within reasonable time, in the interest of justice." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 4/Deputy Director of Education(Secondary) Ayodhya and the opposite party no. 4 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioner is given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 4/ Deputy Director of Education(Secondary) Ayodhya within a period of fifteen days form today and if such representation is moved Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kr. Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mohd. Harun .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Education Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 4 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of two months, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of. November 3, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 12775 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench