NIKHIL SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PRISON ADMINISTRATION AND REFORM SERVICES LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14620/2025 · 2025-12-17
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181843 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181843 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14620 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that inadvertently, certain documents could not be annexed with the petition, due to which petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition. In view thereof, petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file a fresh petition. December 17, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar, Saroj Kumar Verma, Sudhanshu Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Nikhil Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Prison Administration And Reform Services Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench