RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS
/9111/2024 · 2025-11-19
Rajeev Bharti, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181842 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181842 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9111 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
3. On perusal of order sheet, it appears that the case was adjourned on the first date as none appeared on behalf of the petitioner and thereafter it has not been pursued.
4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions dated 28.11.2024 received from Shri Yaduveer Singh, Inspector/Investigating Officer, Police Station- Kudwar, District- Sultanpur, which has been produced before the Court and are taken on record, submits that the charge sheet dated 04.03.2024 has been filed in the court concerned, therefore, this petition has lost its efficacy.
5. Dismissed accordingly. November 19, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arti Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Raj Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench