Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18180 (GAU)

REEJEET NUNISA v. GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI AND 5 ORS

Cont.Cas(C)/449/2025 · 2025-09-25

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010189852025 2025:GAU-AS:13526 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/449/2025 REEJEET NUNISA S/O.- BIMOL CHANDRA NUNISA, R/O. VILLAGE - DIHUR PHONGLO, P.O/P.S - MAIBANG, DISTRICT - DIMA HASAO, ASSAM, PIN - 788831. VERSUS GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI AND 5 ORS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, F- BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, ASSAM SECRETARIAT (CIVIL), DISPUR, GUWAHATI -781006. 2:VARNALI DEKA COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT B -BLOCK SECOND FLOOR JANATA BHAWAN DISPUR GUWAHATI - 06. 3:PARTHA SARATHI JAHARI THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY NORTH CACHAR HILLS AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIMA HASAO HAFLONG PIN - 788819. 4:MUNINDRA NATH NGATEY THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER AND CHAIRMAN DISTRICT DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY DIMASA HASAO HAFLONG Page No.# 2/3 PIN - 788819. 5:SANJIV SHYAM CHIEF ENGINEER PWD (R) ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI PIN - 781003. 6:GAUTAM KUMAR ROY THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD MAHUR ROADS DIVISION MAHUR DIMA HASAO PIN - 788830 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. J. Lotha, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. U. Das, Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 26.09.2025 It has been submitted by Ms. U. Das, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate that the amount has already been paid to the petitioner and accordingly, the order passed by this Court on 13.05.2025 in WP(C) No. 453/2025 has been duly complied with. In that regard, she has placed before this Court a set of instruction(s) issued by the District Commissioner-cum- Chairman, District Disaster Management Authority, Dima Hasao District dated 24.09.2025. The same are kept on record and Page No.# 3/3 collectively marked with the letter “X”. 2. Taking into account the above, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the instant proceedings, for which, the instant contempt proceedings stands dropped. JUDGE Comparing Assistant