APHC010257932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 12892/2025 Between: 1. G. VENKATESWARLU,, S/O LATE AYYANNA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, HINDU, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. H.NO. 1-93, NIDJUR VILLAGE, KURNOOL MANDAL AND DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR HOME SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KURNOOL TALUQA RURAL P.S., KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of Respondents particularly the personnel of the Respondent No. 4, wherein they have been continuously harassing us and calling us to the police station and insisting and threatening the Petitioners to register our properties in the name of third parties, despite pendency of Appeal Suit No. 536 of 2024 before this Hon'ble High Court as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional apart from being violative of articles 14. 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official Respondents to not interfere in our civil disputes and to not insist us to register our properties in the name of third parties and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No. 4 not to harass the Petitioners herein by orally summoning them to the police station in the pretext of enquiry, without any basis; and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI SARAN CHODISETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION No. 12892 of 2025 ORDER: This instant writ petition is preferred seeking writ of mandamus upon respondent No.4, not to harass the petitioner by calling him to the police station. 2. Written instructions placed on record by the learned Assistant Government Pleader Home, contending inter alia that there are specific complaints by the unofficial respondent. After thorough enquiry and preliminary investigation, the police authority is of opinion that there is a civil dispute between the parties and they have closed the PGRS.No.KUR202504212223. 3. Taking note of the written instructions of the Respondent-Authority, the instant writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated: 05.05.2026 CVD