RAJESH KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO.
ABAIL/1215/2025 · 2025-11-11
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181796 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181796 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1215 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 345 of 2011, under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C, P.S. Hanswar, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3.Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing at some length, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). November 11, 2025 DiVYa Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Kumar Soni, Abhijeet Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Rajesh Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench