W.P.No.46796 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.12.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No. 46796 of 202 5 and W.M.P.No s.52233 & 52234 of 202 5 1 Marimuthu 2 Irusayi 3 Munusamy 4 Vigneshwaran 5 S.Chellamuthu 6 Santha 7 Thirunavukarasu 8 Gurusamy 9 Arumugam 10 Sumathi 11 Chinnammal https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.46796 of 2025 12 Selvanayagi 13 Karthikeyan 14 Mathaiyan 15 Ramesh 16 Boopathi 17 Krishnamoorthy 18 Rukmani 19 Raman 20 Ravichandran 21 Kannan 22 Mariyammal 23 Dhinakaran Velu 24 Bharanitharan 25 Palaniyammal 26 Senthilvel 27 Ramachandran 28 Rangarajan https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.46796 of 2025 29 Anbu ..Petitioners vs 1 The Collector Salem District, Salem. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur, Salem District. 3 The Tahsildar Mettur Taluk, Mettur, Salem district. 4 The Commissioner Mettur Municipality, Mettur Dam, Salem District. ..Respondents. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the notice issued by the 4 th respondent in Na.Ka.911/2025/1 dated 18.11.2025(served on20.11.2025) U/S 128 Tamil Nadu Urban Local bodies Act (Amended) 1998 and quash the same and direct the respondents 1 to 3 to issued patta to the petitioners for their respective occupation in Natham land in T.S.No.1, Old S.No.42/17 at Ward-B, Block-16, Mettur Salem District. For Petitioners : Mr.P.M.Subramaniam, Senior Counsel for Mr.V.Elangovan https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.46796 of 2025 For Respondents : Mr.T.Arunkumar, Addl.Govt.Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.LP.Maurya, Standing Counsel for R4 O R D E R S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. Show cause notice issued under Section 128(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act, 1998 is under challenge in the present writ petition. 2. The impugned notice dated 18.11.2025 shows that earlier, an opportunity was granted to the writ petitioners by the Commissioner of Municipality, vide its notice, directing the alleged encroachers to submit their documents. One encroacher appeared before the Commissioner and submitted his written explanation stating that they are initiating action to secure patta and therefore, encroachments may not be removed. 3. The authorities, after conducting survey, issued the impugned notice dated 18.11.2025, granting 15 days time to vacate the subject property voluntarily, failing which, further enforcement action will be initiated under Section 128(2) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies Act. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.46796 of 2025 4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners would mainly contend that the impugned notice cannot be construed as a show cause notice. The authorities have already decided the issue and therefore, the said order is liable to be set aside. 5. The learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that initially survey was conducted by the authorities by affording opportunity to the encroachers. After conducting survey, the authorities identified the encroachment and issued the notice under Section 128(1)(b) of the Act. If at all, the petitioner/encroachers are aggrieved, they may submit further representation or written explanation along with the documents to the Commissioner of Municipality, who in turn, shall consider and thereafter, initiate the enforcement action for removal of encroachment. 6. Earlier, eight writ petitioners filed W.P.No.15210/2025 seeking removal of unauthorized constructions in 50 feet public road located in Ward-B, Block-16 in Town Survey No.1 within Mettur Municipality limit as per the map dated 04.06.2015 issued by Mettur Municipality. The Division Bench of this Court disposed of the writ petition on 07.07.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.46796 of 2025 directing the Commissioner, Mettur Municipality to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners on 28.04.2024 and take enforcement actions, after affording opportunity to the encroachers. In pursuance to the said orders of this Court, notice under Section 128(1)(b) of the Act has been issued. Thus, writ petition against such show cause notice is not entertainable. The petitioners, instead of submitting explanation have chosen to file the writ petition which deserves no merit for consideration. Therefore, the petitioners are at liberty to submit their explanation along with documents, if any, within a period of seven days from today and on receipt of any such explanation, the Commissioner shall look into the written submission along with the documents, if any, and thereafter, continue the enforcement action against all the encroachers and conclude the same within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.No.52232 of 2025 is ordered and W.M.P.Nos.52233 & 52234 of 2025 are closed. Page 6 of 9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.46796 of 2025 (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 03.12.2025 vsi Index : Yes Speaking order : Yes To 1 The Collector Salem District, Salem. 2 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur, Salem District. 3 The Tahsildar Mettur Taluk, Mettur, Salem district. 4 The Commissioner Mettur Municipality, Mettur Dam, Salem District. Page 7 of 9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.46796 of 2025 S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J. and C.KUMARAPPAN,J. vsi W.P.No. 46796 of 202 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.46796 of 2025 03.12.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis