SURAJ NARAYAN GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRIN.SECY.SPORTS DEPTT. LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/3002/2020 · 2025-12-11
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181768 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181768 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3002 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 11, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manju Gupta, Archana Rawat Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ashutosh Kumar Shahi (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Suraj Narayan Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Sports Deptt. Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench