BALENDRA KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
/1295/2025 · 2025-11-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181757 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181757 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1295 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Tripathi, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mayank Sinha, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.
2. After arguing the matter at great length, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the instant application.
3. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed . November 28, 2025 Preeti Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Balendra Kumar Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench