RAM SAGAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/11068/2025 · 2025-11-18
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181744 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181744 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11068 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. We have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties
2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayer:- (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the Opp. Party No. 1, 2 & 3 to demarcate the Land of Gata No. 934/ 0.316 and Gata No. 1070/ 1.682 hectare situated at Village-Shahpur Vinaura, Pargana- Gopamau, Tehsil & District- Hardoi and dispossess the Opp. Party No. 5 to 9 from the illegal of encroached share of the petitioners' share..."
3. From a perusal of the facts, it is clear that the petitioners are required to make a proper application under Section 24 of the U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006.
4. In view of the same, we cannot interfere in the matter.
5. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioners to approach the Revenue Court in accordance with law. November 18, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ram Sagar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench