RAKESH KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN.SECY. DEPTT. SUGARCANE AND SUGAR LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/14412/2025 · 2025-12-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181741 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181741 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14412 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petitioner is granted liberty to implead the Secretary, State Cane Services Authority, Lucknow as opposite party No.5 during the course of day.
3. Notice on behalf of newly impleaded opposite party has been accepted by Mr.Tushar Mittal, Advocate who has filed his power, which is taken on record.
4. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned to consider case of the petitioner for absorption on the post of government Jeep Driver in accordance with directions issued by the State Government vide letter dated 30.05.2017.
5. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party No.2, i.e., Cane Commissioner, Lucknow or any other competent authority, who shall consider and decide the same, within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the concerned authority.
6. With aforesaid direction(s), petition stands disposed of. December 15, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Shukla, Alok Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Rakesh Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin.Secy. Deptt. Sugarcane And Sugar Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench