[2025:RJ-JP:19609] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 6145/2025 Sunita W/o Shri Manish Kumar D/o Shri Rampratap Bishnoi, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Word Number 12, Rawla Mandi, Police Station Rawla Mandi, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.). (Accused Petitioner Is In Confinement At Central Jail Jaipur And In Custody Since 30.01.2025) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/05/2025 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.09/2025 registered at Police Station Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS and SOG for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and Sections 3, 4, 6, 2(F)(ii) and 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Measures For Prevention of Unfair Means In Recruitment) Act, 2022. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner did not adopt any malpractice in examination conducted by the Rajasthan High Court for the post of Junior Judicial Assistant, Clerk Grade-II on 12.03.2023 and [2025:RJ-JP:19609] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6145/2025] 19.03.2023. The petitioner got selected in the said examination through her own capability and not involved in cheating. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2025 and having a minor child aged about 8 months along with her in the custody, therefore, considering the above facts, the second bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner- Sunita adopted malpractice in the examination conducted by the Rajasthan High Court for the post of Junior Judicial Assistant, Clerk Grade-II and got selected in the said examination. It is alleged against the petitioner that she used Bluetooth device at the examination center during the entire examination period. It is also contended that mobile No.8949979992 was registered in the name of the petitioner and the mobile number which was used for cheating through Bluetooth device was active and their locations were found nearby the examination center. The petitioner appeared in the examination center located at Ganganagar and the location of the petitioner's mobile phone was also found near the examination center. The petitioner has used mobile number 7891800043 and during examination time, she was in contact with some other persons through other mobile Nos.9119374029 and 7891800046. The petitioner was found in adopting malpractice and getting her selected in the said examination, therefore, the second bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:19609] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6145/2025] 5. The investigation revealed that the petitioner used mobile No.7891800046, and during examination she was in contact with some other person through mobile Nos.911937029 and 9352236129. The location of mobile phone used by the petitioner 789140006 was found in the vicinity of the examination center, therefore, considering the above facts, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Hence, the second bail application of the accused-petitioner is hereby, dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/5