APHC010252192007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25979/2007 Between: 1. MD. HUSSAIN, EX. JR. OPERATOR (POCLAIN), R/O D-312 BACKSIDE, SUNNIPENTA, SRISAILAM PROJECT, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER 3 OTHERS, PATEL ENGINEERING LTD., ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS POST SRISAILAM WEST, MAHABUBNAGAR DISTRICT. 2. THE VICE PRESIDENT PATEL ENGINEERING LTD, ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS 6-3-635, 4TH FLOOR, AKASH GANGA APARTS, KHAIRATABAD, HYDERABAD-4 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER AP GANERATION CORPORATION LTD, (GENCO) SRISAILAM LEFT BANK SLBHES, MAHABUBNAGR DISTRICT. 4. THE HONBLE LABOUR COURTIII, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue any Writ, order or direction more particualrly one inthe nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in MP No. 4/2004, dt 14-07-2006 on the file of the Hon'ble Labour Court-III, at Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to pay the amount to the petitioner and to pass such other order or roders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper inthe circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 33595 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense withthe filing of the Certified copy of the Common order passed in MP No. 4/2004 dt 14-07-2006 onthe file of Labour Court-III, Hyderabad, and pass such other or further orders. IA NO: 2 OF 2007(WPMP 33892 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Expedite the hearing of the case and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M PRATAP SINGH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR