IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13024 OF 2025 / / Between: Sri Maramreddy Sesha Reddy, S/o. Venkata Raghava Reddy, aged about 73 years, R/o. D.No. 28/3/17, Sriram Nagar Colony, Mypad Gate Centre, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary (Home Department), Secretariat Building, Velgapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore District. 3. The Station House Officer, Dagadarthi Police Station, SPSR Nellore District. 4. Smt. Potiuru Jayamma, W/o. Late Pullaiah, Hindu, aged about 73 years, R/o. Kothapalli Kowrugunta Village, Sunnapubatti Centre, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 5. Smt. Potiuru Prasanna, W/o. Ravindra Babu, Hindu, aged about 53 years, R/o. Kothapalli Kowrugunta Village, Sunnapubatti Centre, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. / ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more particularly one in the nature of may writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 herein in not providing police protection to the petitioner as against the respondent No. 4 and 5 and their men inspite of Permanent Injunction Judgment and Decree Dated 27-01-2020, in O.S.No. 111/2017 on the file of the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge Kovur, SPSR Nellore District in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent No. 4 and 5 and their Men restraining them from interfering with the Suit Schedule property of the petitioner i.e. land in Sy.No. 320/2, admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0.31 Cents, situated at Kothapalli Kourugunta Village, Dagadarti Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, further inspite of Representation of the Petitioner dated 10-03-2025 as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to the established principles of law and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to provide Police protection to the petitioner pertaining to suit schedule property. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 / Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to provide Police protection to the petitioner pertaining to suit schedule property vide Judgment and Decree Dated 27-01-2020, in O.S.No. 111/2017 on the file of the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur, SPSR Nellore District i.e. land in Sy.No. 320/2, admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0.31 Cents, situated at Kothapalli Kourugunta Village, Dagadarti Mandal, SPSR Nellore District by taking into consideration the representation dated 10-03-2025 pending disposal of the present writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:Smt K PALLAVI Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME / Counsel for the Respondents No.4,5: --- The Court made the following: ORDER 1 APHC010258772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] ■a THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13024/2025 Between: Sri Maramreddy Sesha Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KPALLAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer; "....pleased to issue an appropriate writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 herein in not providing police protection to the petitioner as against the respondent No. 4 and 5 and their men inspite of Permanent Injunction Judgment and Decree Dated 27.01.2020 in O.S. No.111/2017 on the file of the Honbie Principal Junior Civil Judge Kovur SPSR Neiiore District in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent Nos.4 and 5 and their Men restraining them from interfering with the Suit Schedule property of the petitioner i e land in Sy No 320/2 admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.31 Cents situated at KothapaHi Kourugunta Village Dagadarti Mandai SPSR Neiiore District further inspite of Representation of the Petitioner dated 10.03.2025 as illegal arbitrary and opposed to the established principles of law 2 and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 herein to provide Police protection to the petitioner pertaining to suit scheduleproperty pass..." Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. As relief sought for is innocuous, notice to respondents 4 and 5 is dispensed with. 2. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite making an application seeking police aid in terms of the decree dated 27.01.2020 in O.S.No.111 of 2017 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur, SPSR Nellore District, the respondent Nos.2 and 3 have not acted on the same which is arbitrary and illegal. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home instructions, submitted that although the police made several attempts to contact the petitioner, he failed to respond. Consequently, the application made by the petitioner has been closed. In support of this contention, the call details of the police have also been filed. 4. on Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner attempted to visit respondent No. 3, even day before yesterday; however, no action was taken on his request. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the only for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 not providing police aid appears to be the petitioner's alleged failure to respond to their phone calls, which is now 6. reason 3 being disputed, and that petitioner is willing to once again approach them, it would suffice to dispose the writ petition. In view of the above, petitioner is permitted to make fresh 7. representation to respondent No.3 within a period of one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the request of the petitioner for providing police protection, keeping in view of the fact that a decree has been passed by the competent civil Court, within a period of two (2) weeks, thereafter. 8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, (Home Department) Secretariat Building, Velgapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, SPSR Nellore District. 3. The Station House Officer, Dagadarthi Police Station, SPSR Nellore District. 4. Smt. Potiuru Jayamma, W/o. Late Pullaiah, Hindu, aged about 73 years R/o. Kothapalli Kowrugunta Village, Sunnapubatti Centre, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. //• 5. Smt. Potiuru Prasanna, W/o. Ravindra Babu, Hindu, aged about 53 years, R/o. Kothapalli Kowrugunta Village, Sunnapubatti Centre, Dagadarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. ^ 6. One CC to Smt. K PALLAVI Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 8. Three C.D.Copies nm %■ \ HIGH COURT DATED:22/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.13024 of 2025 9 21 MAtf 2I)?5 \ Current uacuon . >>5fSPATCHtO DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS