PRAKASH CHANDRA MISHRA v. VINAY KUMAR PANDEY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATIONSECONDARYLKO andANR.
CAPL/3294/2018 · 2025-12-02
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181706 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181706 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3294 of 2018 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that despite repeated efforts, the applicant is not responding as such, the present contempt application may be dismissed for want of instructions. As prayed, the present contempt application is dismissed for want of instructions. Notice, if any, stands discharged. December 2, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Prakash Chandra Mishra .....Applicant(s) Vinay Kumar Pandey Director Of Educationsecondarylko Andanr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench