HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1623 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate for State. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.188 of 2025 under Section 333, 109, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 191(2), 191(3) BNS/452, 307, 323, 506, 504, 147, 148 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)5 of SC/ST Act, Police Station Auras, District Unnao. 3.Learned counsel for applicant, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the present anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). November 3, 2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Gulam Mustafa Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Mulk Raj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench