Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18170 (RAJ)

YADVENDRA SINGH RAJAWAT SON OF SHRI RAGHUNANDAN SINGH RAJAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8374/2025 · 2025-07-07

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24992] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8374/2025 Yadvendra Singh Rajawat Son Of Shri Raghunandan Singh Rajawat, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Village Talawara, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through, District Collector And District Magistrate, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 2. Additional Chief Engineer, Public Works Department (PWD), Tonk, Rajasthan. 3. Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department (PWD), Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 4. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Through, Senior Regional Manager, Kota Retail Office, First And Second Floor, Plot No. 12, Near Gumanpura Police Station, Jhalawar Road, Kota, Rajasthan, Pin No 324007. 5. Ramraj Meena Son Of Shri Latur Mal Meena, Resident Of Village Meenapada, Patwar Halka, Tehsil Talawada, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaideep Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/07/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ventilating his grievance, a representation was filed by the petitioner before the authority concerned on 21.04.2025 but till date, no decision has been taken on his representation. He further submits that in [2025:RJ-JP:24992] (2 of 2) [CW-8374/2025] these circumstances, authority concerned may be directed to dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner. Considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it just and proper to direct the concerned authority to decide the representation filed by the petitioner by way of passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. Authority concerned is further directed to communicate the fate of the representation to the petitioner. It is made clear that this Court has not passed any observation on the merits of the case and thus, the representation, if any filed by the petitioner, may be decided in accordance with law without being influenced or prejudiced by this order. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. Stay application and pending application(s) (if any) also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/79