[2025:JHHC:23519] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4402 of 2025 Ajay Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar, aged about 36 years, S/o Jawala Prasad, R/o Mohalla Damaria, Near Near Kabristan, Kahar Toli, P.O. Anishabad, P.S. Gardanibagh, District-Patna, State Bihar. ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Sema Kumari, W/o Sri Ajay Kumar, R/o New Staff Quarter, A-17, New Raj Bhawan, Buti Road, Ranchi University, P.O. and P.S.-Lalpur, District-Ranchi, State Jharkhand. ..... … Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jyoti Prakash, Advocate. For the State : Mr. S.K. Shukla, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 13.08.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 615 of 2021, registered for the alleged offence under Sections 323, 494, 498-A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class-XXXII, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be the husband of the complainant-O.P. No. 2 and the complainant has falsely implicated the petitioner in the case on the false allegation of demanding the dowry, however, the amount in question has been received by the complainant in her account itself, which is meagre amount. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner happened to be the husband of the complainant and the allegation of demand of dowry is there. 5. It appears that the case is arising out of a complaint case [2025:JHHC:23519] -2- and the amount has been received in the account of the complainant herself and further considering the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Versus Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner, named above, on the appropriate terms and conditions or on sureties as may deem fit and proper by the learned Court. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-