Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1817 (UTT)

VIRENDRA CHANDRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/122/2025 · 2025-02-12

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:779 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PSS No. 1 2 2 of 2 0 2 5 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. S.K. Mandal and Mr. Sohan Singh Mehta, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Sachin Kumar Mehta, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The petitioner is praying for the following relief(s): i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondents to grant the promoted Pay Scale (Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/-) to the petitioner from 26.10.2025, arrear with interest, details were given in paragraph no.7 to the writ petition. ii) Issue a suitable writ order or direction in the nature, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue, as raised in the present petition, has been dealt with by this Court in WPSS No. 2267 of 2024, decided on 05.12.2024 and also submits that the present writ petition be disposed of in terms of the said judgement. 5. Mr. Sachin Kumar Mehta, learned Brief Holder for the State, fairly submits that the issue as raised in this petition is covered by the said judgment. 6. In view of the statement as advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed on 05.12.2024 in WPSS No.2267 of 2024. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 12 .02.2025 R.Bisht 2025:UHC:779