- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10697 WP No. 53067 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.53067 OF 2016 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. M. S. RUDRAMURTHY, S/O. LATE SIDDAVEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO 1205, SANTHEPETE BADAVANE, OIL MILL ROAD, TUMKUR CITY - 572 101. TUMKUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI. T. K. ABDUL WAHID, S/O. T. ABDUL KHALAK, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO 32, "RAHAMAT MANJEL" K. N. S. MILL ROAD, SANTHEPETE BADAVANE, TUMKUR CITY - 572101 TUMKUR DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B. J. KRISHNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU- 560 001. Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10697 WP No. 53067 of 2016 2. THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD, BY IT'S MANAGING DIRECTOR, NO. 49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOOR, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, NIMZ, K I A D B, MARUTHI TOWER, B. H. ROAD, TUMKUR - 572 101. TUMKUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SESHU V. HCGP FOR R1; SRI. P.V. CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND QUASH THE NOTIFICATION DATED 23.04.2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITY IN RESPECT OF THE SL.NO.2 LAND BEARING SY.NO.49/1, OF NELAHAL VILLAGE, BELLAVI HOBLI, TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT VIDE ANNEXURE -F AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On the previous occasions, when the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he has filed memo of retirement, this Court directed that unless alternative - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10697 WP No. 53067 of 2016 arrangement is made for representation of the petitioners, the memo of retirement cannot be accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioners however submits that he has returned the file and he is not in a position to go on with the matter. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE AP CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26