HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1759 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in seven cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as follows: "i. Case Crime No. 141 of 2025, under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Auras, District Unnao; ii. Case Crime No. 246 of 2025, under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Auras, District Unnao;; iii. Case Crime No. 247 of 2025, under Sections 305, 331(4), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Fatehpur Chaurasi, District Unnao; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheeraj Awasthi, Gautam Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manjeet .....Applicant(s) Sate Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) iv. Case Crime No. 248 of 2025, under Sections 305, 331(4), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Fatehpur Chaurasi, District Unnao; v. Case Crime No. 270 of 2025, under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Auras, District Unnao; vi. Case Crime No.272 of 2025, under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Auras, District Unnao and vii. Case Crime No. 273 of 2025, under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) BNS, Police Station Auras, District Unnao." 4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other six cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. November 17, 2025 Preeti NA528 No. 1759 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench