MOHAMMAD SHAHNAWAZ KALIM ALIAS TWINKLE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5940/2025 · 2025-07-21
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18165 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18165 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:19931 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5940 of 2025
------ Mohammad Shahnawaz Kalim @ Twinkle, age 38 years, s/o Mohammad Kalim @ Md. Kalim Khan, r/o Mistry Mohalla, P.O.+P.S.-Doranda, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 21.07.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No.84 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 190, 109, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 351(3), 352, 79, 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being member of an unlawful assembly attempted to murder the informant Nadim Ansari, Asif and Jawed @ Chhotaku. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the allegation of firing is upon Rustam Khan, Ajju, Vicky and Moin. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.04.2025 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated
17.07.2025 in B.A. No.4295 of 2025. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be also released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.F.C., Ranchi in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No.84 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/