SUDHIR SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/11554/2025 · 2025-11-25
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181630 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181630 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11554 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.300 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Deva, District Barabanki.
3. It is argued that the co-accused, the mother in law, has been enlarged on bail. The applicant is the husband.
4. Considering and adopting the same reasoning, the applicant is also entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.
5. Let the applicant Sudhir Singh Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sudhir Singh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 25, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11554 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench