HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1631 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State and Shri Jay Prakash Singh, learned Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0269/2025, Sec-319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3) & 340 (2) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station-Salon, District-Raebareli. After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided in view of law laid by Supreme Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another". Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the complainant have no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant. In view of the above, present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed. It is provided that in case a regular bail application is filed within ten days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, the same be decided in view of the law laid by by Supreme Court vide order dated 7.10.2021 passed in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). November 4, 2025/R.C. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shishir Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Jay Prakash Singh Vats (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Aditya Shukla .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench