HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10685 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Akshay Bajpai, Advocate on behalf of respondent nos. 4 and 5 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 3. Upon perusal of the documents on record, we are of the view that the present writ petition is misconceived as the same is against a notice issued under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner has an alternative remedy of approaching the Debts Recovery Tribunal. 4. In light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal in accordance with law for redressal of his grievance. November 4, 2025 Raj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Kumar Tripathi, Aditya Vikram Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Kapish Srivastava (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Kishore Kumar Pal @ Kishor Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Finance Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench