Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181595 (ALL)

DAUD IBRAHIM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/12112/2025 · 2025-12-04

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12112 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.390 of 2025, under sections 137(2),87, 64(2)(m) BNS, Section 3/5(1) Prevention of Conversion of Religion Act, Section 3(2)(V) SC/ST Act, Section 5(L)/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Mill Area, District Raebareli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently in her statement before the medical authority the victim said that she had gone out of her own free will. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS also she admitted that both of them had gone to Bhopal and physical relation were formed with her consent. There is no definite document with regard to exact age of the victim. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and statement of the victim, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 5.10.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Daud Ibrahim be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Verma, Praveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Daud Ibrahim .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 4, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12112 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench