Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181575 (ALL)

SUBHASH CHANDRA v. TEHSILDAR JUDICIAL, TEHSIL AKBARPUR, AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND OTHERS

A227/6656/2025 · 2025-11-14

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6656 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to the private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1- Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil- Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, to decide Restoration Application dated 02.05.2025 in Mutation Application No. 05559/2019, Keshav Prasad v. Sarju Prasad (Computerized Case No. T-201904040105559), Keshav Prasad v. Sarju Prasad, expeditiously, within stipulated time period fixed by the Hon'ble Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1- Tehsildar (Judicial), Tehsil- Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to consider and decide the Restoration Application dated 02.05.2025 in Mutation Application No. 05559/2019, Keshav Prasad v. Sarju Prasad (Computerized Case No. T- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Subhash Chandra .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar Judicial, Tehsil Akbarpur, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s) 201904040105559), Keshav Prasad v. Sarju Prasad, within a period of five months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in case there is no legal impediment, in accordance with law. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 14, 2025 A.Nigam A227 No. 6656 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench