RAVI SHANKAR VERMA @ RAVI VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/3829/2025 · 2025-11-27
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181573 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181573 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 3829 of 2025 Court No. - 27 HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant submits that due to a typographical error, the date of the impugned order has been wrongly mentioned as 30.10.2020 instead of 03.10.2020 in the margin of the memo of appeal, therefore, it is prayed that he may be permitted to rectify the error in the memo of appeal regarding the date of the impugned order. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to correct the date of the impugned order as mentioned in the appeal memo as well as the application for interim relief during the course of the day. 3. The instant criminal appeal under section 14(A)(1) of the SC/ST Act has been filed against the impound order dated 03.10.2020 whereby cognizance has been taken against the appellant of the charges under sections 323, 427, 504, 506 IPC and 3(1)(DA) and 3(1)(DHA) SC/ST Act,on the basis of chargesheet filed after investigation in Case Crime No.304 of 2019 of Police Station, Nagraan, District, Lucknow. 4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the offences are punishable with a maximum term of 7 years of imprisonment and the appellant were not arrested during investigation and now the court below has taken cognizance by the impugned order, therefore, the prayer is Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Vivek Joshi, Praveen Yadav, Shyamendra Singh, Tej Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Ravi Shankar Verma @ Ravi Verma .....Appellant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s)
confined to the extent that necessary direction may kindly be issued to the court below to consider the bail application of the appellant in terms of guidelines issued by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022) 10 SCC 51 . 6. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant. 7. In view of above prayer, the appeal is finally disposed off. The appellant is directed to appear before the court below within a month from today and move an application for bail which shall be heard and disposed of in terms of guidelines issued by Hon'ble Supreme in Satender Kumar Antil (Supra). 8.
For a period of one month from today, no coercive process shall be adopted against the appellant by the court below. November 27, 2025 dk/ CRLA No. 3829 of 2025 2 (Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEVENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench