Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181560 (ALL)

PUTTI ALIAS PUTTILAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND OTHERS

/4392/2024 · 2025-11-19

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4392 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded, and the charge sheet has been filed against the accused person. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner, who is the first informant, does not dispute the aforesaid fact. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 19, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Yadav, Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Putti Alias Puttilal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench