Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18154 (JHR)

DANIEL HORO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/480/2023 · 2025-07-04

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:17979 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 480 of 2023 Daniel Horo, aged about 80 years, son of Late Paulus Horo, resident of Village kathkuawari, P.O Mahugaon, P.S Lapung, Dist. Ranchi. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Akash Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, District Education officer Ranchi, having its office at near Court Compound, Kutchery Road, P.O- G.P.O. Ranchi, P.S Kotwali, Dist. Ranchi. 3. Abhay Kumar Mishra, son of not known to the petitioner, General Manager, Central Pension Processing Cell, State Bank of India, 4th Floor, CPPC Administrative Building, J.C. Road, P.O & P.S Patna, District Patna, Bihar. 4. Akhilesh Kumar Mahto, son of not known to the petitioner, Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Lapung Branch, P.O Mahugaon, P.S Lapung, District Ranchi. 5. Anup Francis Dundung, son of not known to the petitioner, Accountant General, State of Jharkhand, having its office at Doranda, P.O & P.S Doranda, District Ranchi. … … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Maninder Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate -------- Order No. 26/Dated: 4th July 2025 This contempt case has been filed alleging willful and deliberately not complying the Award dated 12.11.2022 passed in W.P.(S) No. 4970 of 2019. 2. Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that as per instruction the entire payment has been made. 3. In reply to the same, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the break up has not yet been given to the petitioner as such he may be given liberty that if at all any amount towards any head is still pending, he would be at liberty to raise grievance before the appropriate authority/appropriate Court. 2025:JHHC:17979 2 4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and submission, the instant contempt case is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. 5. Pending I.As, if any, stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit