IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHA PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPOA No. : 2211 of 2019 Decided on : 27.05.2025 Kailash and Ors. .…Petitioners. Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri,Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pratush Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Instructions have been placed on record, according to which, the bunching benefit has been extended to the petitioners. It has also been submitted that the separate orders regarding pay fixation will be issued shortly. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:HHC:16081 ) 2. In view of above development, the relief prayed in the petition has been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. 3. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. 4. It is expected from the respondents that the needful shall be done expeditiously and in any case not later than six weeks from today. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 27th May, 2025 Judge (sushma)