HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9558 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Sri Dhruv Ashish, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sanjive Kumar Tripathi, has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 which is taken on record. 2. Heard Ms. Neelam Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dhruv Ashish, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sanjive Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, learned counsel for the State and perused the records. 3. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 26.03.2022, under Sections 323, 506, 452, 427 I.P.C. in F.I.R. No. 048 of 2022, Police Station Sushant Golf City, District Lucknow (State and another vs. Vineet Tiwari) along with entire criminal proceedings arising from the aforementioned F.I.R. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants states that an order was passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 18.09.2025, directing the applicant to file the compromise deed before the court concerned which was to be verified by the court concerned. In pursuance of the said order, the court concerned vide order dated 15.10.2025 verified the said compromise. Copy of the same is on record. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. 5. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neelam Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sanjive Kumar Tripathi Vineet Tiwari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 6. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the entire proceedings as well as charge sheet as prayed for by the applicants. 7. The present application is allowed. 8. The entire proceedings as well as of the aforesaid case are hereby quashed. November 13, 2025 Manoj A482 No. 9558 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench