Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181534 (ALL)

NAND KUMAR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/13817/2025 · 2025-12-01

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13817 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to grant 4600 Grade pay from 14.06.2012 along with arrear of the differences of salary to the petitioner forthwith." 3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Director, Land Acquisition Directorate, Board of Revenue U.P. Section 10, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 1, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Onkar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Nand Kumar Shukla .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench