Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181531 (ALL)

MANGAL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPT. LKO.

/8512/2024 · 2025-12-08

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW . CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8512 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.47 of 2023, under Sections 302, 504, 506, 120B, 34 IPC and Section 3/25/27 of Arms Act, Police Station Bihar, District Unnao. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that 09.03.2023, after dinner, the informant was sleeping with her husband when the four accused named in the FIR came armed with country made pistol and the applicant caused firearm injury to the husband of the informant, which resulted in his death. The postmortem report on record indicates the presence of firearm injury on the side of the neck. The informant is the eyewitness of the incident and had supported the prosecution version in her statement. The weapon was also recovered from the applicant. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the manner in which the applicant had caused the firearm injury to the husband of the informant at his home, I am of the view that the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Singh, Girish Kumar Pandey, Sher Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mangal Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Dept. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. The trial court shall make an earnest endeavour to conclude the trial expeditiously. December 8, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 8512 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench