Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181529 (ALL)

DUKHI RAM v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION, AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS

/6788/2025 · 2025-11-20

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6788 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the State respondent to decide Revision No. RST / 1953 / 2426/2012- 2013, Computerized Case No. C-20120400001132 (Ran Vijay Singh Vs. Chirkut and others) U/S 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide Revision No. RST / 1953 / 2426/2012-2013, Computerized Case No. C- 20120400001132 (Ran Vijay Singh Vs. Chirkut and others) U/S 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously, say within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., C.S.C., Mohan Singh Dukhi Ram .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Administration, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 20, 2025 Ravi/ A227 No. 6788 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench