Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18152 (AP)

Doddigarla Venkateswara Rao, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/16561/2020 · 2025-08-27

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010251792020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16561/2020 Between: 1. DODDIGARLA VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O. MANIKYAM, AGED 71 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, 2. DODDIGARLA RAKESH RAJU,, S/O. RAJA RAO, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, 3. DODDIGARLA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O. CHINA MANIKYAM, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, IMPEDIMENT 4. DODDIGARLA NIRMALA,, W/O. PULLAYYA, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, PETITIONERS 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDENTS OF VEERISETTIGUDEM VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE AND REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM REVENUE DIVISION, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATECUMTAHSILDAR, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADIKALPUDI POLICE STATION, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. DODDI MANOHARAM, S/O. PRASADA RAO, AGED . 45 YEARS. 8. DODDI YESU, S/O. PRASADA RAO, AGED . 40 YEARS, 9. DODDI PEDA MANOHARAM, S/O. PRAPANCHA RAO, AGED . 39 YEARS, 10. DODDI CHINA MANOHARAM, S/O. PRAPANCHA RAO, AGED . 34 YEARS, 11. DODDI NAGANNA BABU, S/O. PRAPANCHA RAO, AGED . 32 2 YEARS, 12. BALUVURI VICTORIYA RANI, D/O. DODDI BALA KRISHNA, W/O. BALUVURI VIDYA SAGAR AGED . 35 YEARS, 13. BALUVURI VIDYA SAGAR, S/O. PRAPANCHA RAO, AGED . 40 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS. 7 TO 13 ARE RESIDENTS OF ADAMILLI VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of respondents 2 to 6 on petitioners' representations dated 14.08.2020 and 29.08.2020 submitted for granting police aid for cultivation of petitioners' landed properties admeasuring Ac.4.33 cents covered by Survey No.429/5 of Tadikalapudi Revenue Village in Kamavarapukota Mandal of West Godavari District, in view of decree for permanent injunction dated 20.08.2015 granted in favour of petitioners in O.S.No. 58/2009 on the file of learnt Junior Civil Judge, Chintalapudi, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on respondents 2 to 6 under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to grant necessary police aid for cultivation of petitioners' said lands.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, the matter is of civil nature and the Police cannot interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Ms.Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, in view of the decree of permanent injunction granted in favour of the Petitioners in O.S.No.58 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil 3 Judge, Chintalapudi, the Respondents may be directed to consider the representation of the Petitioners for providing police aid. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Respondents–Police to consider the representation of the Petitioner and take appropriate course of action according to governing rules and law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.08.2025 Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.16561 of 2020 Dt.28.08.2025 Dinesh