BABOO LAL YADAV v. STATE OF U.P.THRU SECY.RURAL DEVELOPMENT LKO and ORS.
WRIA/255/2020 · 2025-12-09
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181511 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181511 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 255 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 9, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sachin Tiwari, Satyendra Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Baboo Lal Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Secy.Rural Development Lko And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench