RAM SWAROOP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
/11075/2025 · 2025-12-12
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181506 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181506 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11075 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. Sri Rajesh Kumar Agnihotri who appears for the informant. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.253 of 2025 under sections 117(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 115(2), 126(2), 191(2) BNS, P.S. Sandhana, District Sitapur. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the husband of the informant was beaten up by the four accused named in the FIR, which resulted in his death. The applicant was not named in the FIR. Subsequently, in the statement of the informant as well as the witness, the applicant was also said to be present along with the other co-accused armed with Lathi, Danda etc. The main role of attacking was assigned to one Manmohan. The cause of death, as per the postmortem report is ante-mortem injuries, which are eight in number, which are also the cause of death. 4. Considering the fact that the applicant was not named in the FIR and was subsequently named, no specific role was assigned to the applicant and no recovery has been effected from the applicant, he is entitled for the bail more so, when he has no criminal history and is in jail since 30.07.2025. Thus the bail application is allowed. 5. Let the applicant Ram Swaroop be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rajesh Kumar Agnihotri Ram Swaroop .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
December 12, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11075 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PANKAJ BHATIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench