ANURAG YADAV @ RAJ YADAV v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF/ PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/11214/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181503 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181503 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11214 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.1259 of 2025, under sections 3 (5), 140 (1), 103 (1), 238 of BNS, registered at Police Station Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the co-accused persons Shaban, Ram Sajeevan, Ayush Yadav, Ajeet Yadav, Avinash Verma and Abhishek Yadav having same allegations have been enlarged on bail by the coordinate benches of this Court, hence, the present applicant is also entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering that the nature of allegations against the applicant to be similar as of co-accused persons who have been enlarged on bail, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 13.5.2025, is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity.
6. Let the applicant Anurag Yadav alias Raj Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanat Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A Anurag Yadav @ Raj Yadav .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief/ Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 20, 2025 mks BAIL No. 11214 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench