HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 113/2012 in SWP No. 2420/2011 Arjan Singh …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None. vs Ejaz Iqbal Secy. Forest Dept. and others .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE ORDER 10.02.2025 1. There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the previous two consecutive dates of hearing. Same is the position today also. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the compliance report has been filed by the respondents, however, the same is not on record. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced a copy of the compliance report for perusal of this Court. The same is taken on record. 4. A perusal of the compliance report filed by the respondents reveals that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. 5. In view of this, the contempt proceedings are dropped and the instant contempt petition is accordingly disposed of, leaving the petitioner free to avail appropriate remedy as available under law. (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE Jammu 10.02.2025 Sahil Padha Serial No. 50 Sahil Padha 2025.02.10 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document