Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18149 (AP)

Chitturi Satyanarayana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLRC/602/2025 · 2025-06-18

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

% IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE M TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE fS PRESENT ^ THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 602 OF 2025 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order passed in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 988/2025 in C.C. No. 503/2017 on the file of Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial I Class Magistrate (Junior Division), Kaikaluru, Eluru District. Between: Chitturi Satyanarayana, S/o. Desapathi, aged about 58 years, R/o. Flat No. 303, Sri Anjaneya Residency, 8*^ line, Mutyalareddy Nagar, Guntur- 2, Guntur-ll Town Limits, Guntur District. ...Petitioner/Accused AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Amaravathi. 2. Konduru Uma Maheswara Rao, S/o. Satyam, aged about 63 years, R/o. Gopavaram, Kalidindi Mandal, Eluru District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Ponnam Ravindra Babu Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2: None Appeared The Court made the following: Jf APHC010251412025 f IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 602/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Chitturi Satyanarayana AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PONNAM RAVINDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Criminal Revision Case, inasmuch as against the order passed under Section 311 of ‘the Cr.P.C.,’ the revision case is not maintainable. 2. Permission is accorded. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. \ 2 > As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTIOrjf^lCER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Judge-Cum-Judicial I Class Magistrate (Junior Division), Kaikaluru Eluru District. (Records if any) One CC to Sri Ponnam Ravindra Babu, Advocate [OPUC] Two CC's to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Two CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. SAM RAM * HIGH COURT DATED:19/06/2025 ORDER CRLRC.No.602 of 2025 f n JUL 2025 I ^ . Cutretil Section DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS WITHDRAWN