SMT. RAJ KUMARI and 2 OTHERS v. SMT. GEETA SHAH and 3 OTHERS
SAPLD/420/2016 · 2025-12-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181483 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181483 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 420 of 2016 Court No. - 19 HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. None appeared on behalf of appellants even in the revised list. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. The interim order, if any, stands vacated.
December 1, 2025 Vinay/- Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Kaushal Kishore Tewari, Suresh Chand Rathour Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Prashant Kumar,J.) Smt. Raj Kumari And 2 Others .....Appellant(s) Smt. Geeta Shah And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench