HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6454 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No.1 -Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide objection dated 27.12.2024 filed by the petitioners along with application for vacation of stay order dated 28.11.2024 in Revision No.3054 of 2024 (computerized case No.C202404000003054) "Smt. Anjani Kumari and others Vs.Umesh Chandra and others" under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent No.1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.1 - Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide objection dated 27.12.2024 filed by the petitioners along with application for vacation of stay order dated 28.11.2024 in Revision No.3054 of 2024 (computerized case No.C202404000003054) "Smt. Anjani Kumari and others Vs.Umesh Chandra and others" under Section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 RKM. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Umesh Chandra And Another .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench