Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18148 (ALL)

PRADDUMN SONKAR v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/5347/2025 · 2025-04-28

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:66530 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5347 of 2025 Applicant :- Praddumn Sonkar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Triloki Nath Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. Heard Sri Triloki Nath, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Rajiv Dhar Dwivedi, learned AGA for the State-respondent. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 355 of 2024, under Sections 108 BNS, Police Station Alinagar, District Chandauli, during pendency of the trial in the court below. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that however as per allegation due to the abetement of the applicant, daughter of the informant aged about 17 years committed suicide but entire allegations levelled against the applicant are totally false. 4. He further submitted that it appears only on the basis of vague allegations applicant has been made accused in the present matter. 5. He further submitted that applicant is having no criminal history and he is in jail in the present matter since 27.12.2024. 6. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the arguments on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 8. However, as per allegation due to the abetement of the applicant, deceased committed suicide but it appears that allegation of abetement, prima facie, appears to be vague. 9. Further, applicant is having no criminal history and he is in jail in the present matter since 27.12.2024. 10. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, discussed above, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 11. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 12. Let the applicant-Praddumn Sonkar, be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 13. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 14. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Ankita Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad