SIDHNATH AND ANOTHER v. SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TEHSIL PATTI, PRATAPGARH AND 6 OTHERS
A227/6422/2025 · 2025-11-04
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181478 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181478 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6422 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1 and Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for respondent no.2. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh to decide expeditiously the restoration application, filed on 20.03.2024 by legal heirs of late Thakur Prasad, which is pending in the Suit No. 4985/2017 Computerized No. T-201702570404985, 'Sidhnath and others Vs. Gram Sabha and others, pending before him, in the interest of justice. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh is desired to make all endeavor to decide the restoration application, filed on 20.03.2024 by legal heirs of late Thakur Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Mishra, Ashutosh Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Sidhnath And Another .....Petitioner(s) Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Patti, Pratapgarh And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
Prasad, which is pending in the Suit No. 4985/2017 Computerized No. T- 201702570404985, 'Sidhnath and others Vs. Gram Sabha and others, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
November 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6422 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench