Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18147 (GAU)

AMOL DEBBARMA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2223/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010189462025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2223/2025 AMOL DEBBARMA S/O LATE PARIKHIT DEBBARMA R/O RANI KANI PATHAR, P.S. KAKRABANDH, DIST. GOMATI, TRIPURA, PIN-799105. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM THROUGH THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MR. F A HASSAN,MR. P S BISWAS,MS. J GHOSH,MS. U NANDA,MS. S. CHANDA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 10.09.2025 Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/3 2. By this petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner, namely, Amol Debbarma, has prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with PRC No. 392/2024 (arising out of Dholai P.S. Case No. 228/2015) under Section 302 IPC. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that investigation has resulted in a charge sheet dated 31.05.2023 (i.e. after eight years). Certified copy of the charge sheet has been annexed and also copies of the relevant orders of the learned court below. The case is stated to be about the stage of appearance. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that perhaps scanned TCR may be called for and has opposed the prayer of interim protection made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have perused the ejahar dated 26.08.2015. It appears from the record that there was an inordinate delay in the completion of the investigation. I deem it fit to dispose of the matter at this stage itself. 6. Accordingly, it is provided that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, named above, in connection with PRC No. 392/2024 (arising out of Dholai P.S. Case No. 228/2015) under Section 302 IPC, he shall be released on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- with a suitable surety of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. 7. The direction for pre-arrest bail is subject to the condition that the petitioner: (a) shall not abscond; Page No.# 3/3 (b) shall appear before the trial court; and (c) shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. 8. Violation of condition(s) shall entail cancellation of pre-arrest bail. 9. The anticipatory bail application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant