Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181466 (ALL)

VINEET @ VINEET KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

/2211/2024 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2211 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. The applicant was enlarged on interim anticipatory bail on 25.09.2024. It is informed that subsequently final report was submitted against which protest petition was filed and the applicant was summoned. The applicant has challenged the summoning order in Application U/S 482 No.6484/2024 in which interim protection has been granted to the applicants. 3. Considering the said, prima-facie there is no material at the instance of the applicant to suggest that there is an apprehension of arrest, as such, nothing survives in the matter. 4. Present application is accordingly rejected. 5. It will, however, be open to the applicants to file a fresh application in the event of there being apprehension of arrest. November 26, 2025 nishant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Pandey, Sanjay Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Vineet @ Vineet Kumar And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench